2016 Presidential Election Andrew Weissmann John Solomon Konstantin Kilimnik Latest Mark Meadows Matt Gaetz Mueller Probe Paul Manafort Roger Stone Steve Bannon TS Ellis

Konstantin Kilimnik's joint stolen information, washed through Bannon's propaganda and department

Konstantin Kilimnik's joint stolen information, washed through Bannon's propaganda and department

John Solomon feeds frothy regulation with faux scandals based mostly on once more suspicious propaganda.

What does John Solomon's doc actually show

”The Stolen Info Shared by Konstantin Kilimnik, which has been washed through Bannon's propaganda and department.”

What the title of the article underpinning the doc's propagandist John Solomon became the newest foaming right shiny object. In any case, the passage of an e mail trade between Kilimnik and the state, Eric Schultz, to which Solomon belongs, ends with Kilimnik, who says that Trump is dangerously near Hillary in Russia simply because Ken Vogel, who wrote an article criticizing Manafort, once shared an article criticizing Hillary for her earlier than it revealed it. He mentions the story of Breitbart that on the same day, Russia's stolen DNC emails have been released as a concentrate on Vogel.

First, HRC and his headquarters have launched this shitstorm that’s making an attempt to make use of Putin's development = very dangerous, Putin = Manafort, Manafort = Trump, so Trump = Putin = very dangerous. "If Google Ken Vogel, who wrote the unique BS track, exhibits, he is identical journalist who created the controversy in a month or so, then finding out his story for DNC before supply. http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2016/07/22/ken-vogel-politico-dnc-emails/

He was only twenty days earlier than this, writing to the cigar bar to satisfy Paul Manafort and talk about it how Manafort was going to win Michigan on the similar assembly the place they talked about Ukrainian carving. At that time, Roger Stone, a good friend of Manafort's childhood, went on to say that he had prior information of what Wikileaks had, claiming that he was bothering Steve Bannon's propaganda. Actually, just before the day when Kilimnik wrote this, Stone appropriately predicted that WikiLeaks would ultimately drop John Podesta's emails, which Stone meant that Trump would have a cloth of resistance to answer the Manafort attacks at that time.

The Mueller report exhibits that four days earlier Kilimnik had informed Schultz what Trump's inner voting knowledge confirmed, a method the federal government showed that Manafort was mendacity when he claimed to have shared public info solely with Kilimnik.

[redacted] A number of emails despatched by Kilimnik to US companions and press contacts between late July and mid-August. These e-mails referred to the "internal survey", described the Trump campaign and the place of Manafort in it and evaluated Trump's probabilities of profitable. 895

895 8/18/16 E mail, Kilimnik, Dirkse; 8/18/16 E-mail, Kilimnik to Schultz ; 8/18/16 E-mail, Kilimnik to Marson; 27.7.16 E-mail, Kilimnik, Ash; 8/18/16 E-mail, Carpenter, Ash; eight/18/16 E-mail, Kilimnik to Jackson; 8/18/16 E-mail, Kilimnik, Mendoza-Wilson; eight/19/16 E mail, Kilimnik and Patten. [my emphasis]

So when Kilimnik was lately buying and selling in Michigan in Ukraine, he wrote to a government department and provided him a really quick attack by Steven Bannon on the emails emanating from Hillary, which GRU had stolen to assist Trump (keep in mind, Bannon ran at Breitbart.) [19659004] The newest GOP-spin about Kilimnik is that he had no ties to GRU (although his Oleg Deripaska connection was punished final yr with all different GRUs behind the 2016 assault), because he was truly a government spokesman. So what Solomon seems like – once again utilizing the GOP standards for the scandal – is that somebody he claims was a state institution informant who had stolen paperwork from stolen documents through Bannon to the state, maybe making an attempt to attract consideration to Hillary. 19659004] However it isn’t the story that Solomon tells (nor does Solomon give us the entire doc to see what else Kilimnik had plunged into the alleged informant)

Sources and Strategies of Solomon Propaganda Washing

Earlier than I Describe What Solomon's Latest Fiction doesn’t claim to be talking about his sources and methods, that are presently fairly established. Salomon has persistently been used to undermine Trump's investigation on this method:

  1. Government or Congressional Assets Publish Documents to Salomon
  2. Salomon writes logically ridiculous story-based documents without releasing all documents to be checked
  3. , which haven’t been confirmed by the actual proof he was capable of leak, however which they will, nevertheless, make false authorized complaints
  4. Foamy right nut over the newest pseudo scandal

This specific pseudo scandal is predicated on the doc chosen for the cherry, that Kilimnik does what a fluttered right in charge Christopher Steele for doing and misinterpreting the 2 choice packages. In addition to the cherry fragment despatched to Kilimnik by Schultz, Solomon relies on the next documents:

In current iterations, Salomon's modus operandi has also claimed what Mueller didn’t use. For this objective, this story is predicated on the assertion that Mueller's office acquired an e mail from Kilimnik, which was acquired by three "sources who know the documents."

Special Adviser Robert Mueller Group and FBI Group. Copies of Kilimnik's warning based on sources of data of three paperwork

These three sources sound terribly just like three sources, like Solomon, based mostly on his earlier story that Kilimnik was a state spokesman.

Three sources which are conversant in the interior actions of the Mueller Workplace confirmed to me that the Special Prosecutor's Group had all FBI interviews with government officers and Kilimnik's intelligence to the US Embassy earlier than they introduced him as a Russian sympathy tied to Moscow's inquiry or charged by Kilimnik Manaforti in a system that harms Russian research

Manafort acquired all these paperwork within the discovery, so

So this matches John Salomon's propaganda laundry pattern:

  1. Sources that may use Manafort's discovery paperwork for Salomon
  2. Salomon writes a logically ridiculous story, here in this case, hiding part of the document which may show more about how Kilimnik himself deceived the stolen documents from russia and Steve Bannon's magnified sections into the state department
  3. Sal In line with Omon's story update, Mark Meadows, “asks the regulation The administrator will investigate the dealing with of the FBI and the Manafort assure by the prosecutors, including media leaks and proof that the federal government knew that the black headline is perhaps untrustworthy or suspicious
  4. walnut (and Don Jr. goes even more nuts ) (Replace: Matt Gaetz wrote in this record )

Salomon illogi cal misreading

Now that we've found that that is one other instance of Trump's supporters who use Solomon as a software for washing illogical propaganda to ignite the frenzied right, let's see how he interprets the evidence.

Solomon claims that "Black Ledger", which is allegedly displaying that Paul Manafort acquired unlawful payments from his Ukrainian payers, was an excuse for the FBI utilizing "resurrection" towards him and utilizing it after they have been "warned repeatedly" that it was counterfeit

The FBI described the bookkeeping as one of many the reason why it raised a felony case rejected by Manafort in 2014 and wanted in 2017 to hunt financial institution data to show working in Russian regions in Ukraine

one drawback: the FBI's public dependence on the Common Ledger came months after the covenants have been repeatedly warned that the doc could not be trusted and had been pretend, in accordance with documents, and greater than ten interviews with professional sources.

[snip]

For example, agents mentioned a headline announcement that supports the July 2017 seek for a house in Manafort. one purpose why the FBI introduced felony proceedings towards Manafort

”19. August 2016, when public studies related to the links between Manafort, Ukraine and Russia – together with the alleged "black ledger" containing a free guide The Manafort Celebration Celebration – Manafort left as chairman of the Trump Marketing campaign, "on July 25, 2017 in the FBI Consultant Documentary found.

So his argument is in two phases:

  1. An essential purpose for the "resurrection" of the Manafort research
  2. FBI representatives knew that the primary e-book was pretend however used it anyway

In addition, Salomon recycles the claim that Manafort -Friendly TS Eliot Discovered

The FBI did not claim that the primary ebook was an essential purpose for the "resurrection" of the Manafort research

Logically, all Salomon's paperwork have leaked solely if it is true that the primary ledger was the primary reason for Manafort's analysis in 2017. [19659004] Nevertheless, neither choice exhibits it.

The July inventory choice is to seek for the Manafort Rental along with FBAR, FARA, financial institution fraud, cash laundering and donations from overseas citizens (this is the first recognized determination related to the June 9th assembly). The reference to the stories of Black Ledger comes in a paragraph that has been particularly introduced in the "background." It’s a background-critical background, why Manafort nonetheless did not need to register beneath FARA, however just isn’t introduced as evidence. [19659005] 6. Based mostly on the publicly obtainable info from Manafort, in March 2016, Manafort formally joined Donald J. Trump for President Inc. (the Trunp Marketing campaign). inter alia, facilitating the administration of the approved means of the Republican National Conference. In Might 2016, Manafort turned chairman of the Trump marketing campaign. In June 2016, Manafort announced that he was the actual leader of the Trun ^ marketing campaign by leaving Corey Lewandowski, former campaign manager. On August 19, 2016, when public studies related to the hyperlinks between Manafort, Ukraine and Russia – including alleged "black book" payments outdoors Manafort – Manafort, he left workplace as chairman of Trump Marketing campaign

The subsequent paragraph is a transition that suggests a possible trigger

Elements of the knowledge under

In other phrases, the reference to the guide serves only to elucidate why Manafort was fired, which is a vital background for why he hid his sluggish results. It isn’t a part of the possible cause for the certificate.

In any case, the reference is the truth is the tales of each NYT and AP, the latter of which solely informed concerning the extent of the unpublished lobbying of Manafort and didn’t discuss with it in the Basic Ledger. (Observe that Vogel had not been concerned in anything that makes Kilimnik's allegation that each one Trump's ties to Putin have been troublesome for him to know.)

Particularly, Solomon does not mention the Might 2017 statement to discover a Manafort warehouse, which, as a result of it comes earlier , is more readable about how the federal government targeted on Manafor (a big half because it was not part of Mueller's research), and which was included by reference to a paragraph mentioning Manafort differs from the July statement. This statement describes the e-book as an lively investigation by the FBI.

20. In addition, regulation enforcement authorities investigate whether or not all revenue acquired by Manafort and Gates is properly reported as required by US regulation. In the summertime of 2016, the researchers of the Nationwide Anti-Corruption Workplace of Ukraine acquired a handwritten masterpiece, in line with which it belongs to the Social gathering of Regions ('the Fundamental Letter'). Accounting consists of lots of of pages designed to display funds to numerous Ukrainians and other civil servants

21. There were entries in the constitution that showed that Manafort had paid $ 12.7 million from the Social gathering of Regions in 22 separate payments between 2007 and 2012. The US regulation enforcement investigates whether one in every of these sums has been paid to Manafort or (continued or to them by them

) So when Theresa Buchanan accepted the warrant issued in July, she was reminded that she had already permitted the Might choice, which describes the ebook to be investigated. [19659004] The October stock choice was to grab the bank accounts that Manafort acquired from the Federal Savings Financial institution in Chicago – these are the loans that Manafort traded from the Trump marketing campaign position to Steve Calk, which is proven in the part entitled "Evidence of DMI's work on behalf of US parties in the year. 2005 ”After a discussion on how, under the Bush Administration, Manafort gave details of NSC's talks with Ukraine to Rinat Akhmetov to show that" Our technique is working in the USA "

It isn’t clear how the FBI agent uses AP's April story, m The age confirms that in 2007 Manafort acquired a cost that could be related to the 2005 and 2006 lobbying. section. The possible reason for the declare remains redacted, which can mean that it contained delicate intelligence. The only thing that has not been corrected, nevertheless, is that there are funds within the accounts that correspond to recognized expenses. In 2007 and 2009, Manafort acquired a approach to present the declare of Manafort in 2017 that he acquired his cost in accordance with the needs of his clients. 19659004]

This quote is because of the refusal to simply accept that the primary guide might be true based mostly on the truth that Manafort never paid in money

. denies that his enterprise would get cash, but stated that "all the wiring transactions my company receives are legal fees for political consulting work. I billed my customers and they paid by bank transfer I received through a US bank."

Manafort stated he agreed to pay him " according to their primary financial institutions and instructions. "

Jason Maloni, a spokesman for Manafort, gave AP an extra announcement stating that Manafort acquired all of its payments through financial institution transfers by way of the international banking system

." The work of Manafort in Ukraine was completely open and appropriate, and international labor transfers are completely legal, "

He said that Manafort had by no means been paid in money, but he stated that the exclusive use of financial institution transfers for cost by Manafort undermines the description of the guide by the anti-corruption authorities of Ukraine over the previous yr and regulation enforcement that the detailed money payments of the ebook

Manafort has been responsible of two main details on this paragraph within the supporting document: he was a lobbyist for the Get together of Regions in 2006, and that he was making an attempt to cover this relationship (see ¶¶4, 6 and 7 for these approvals). In response to Norka, the company had advanced to Akhmetov in 2006 and paid it in 2007, so it was not faulty. As well as, the AP story in question, particularly, said that these two payments have been troublesome to verify, which seems to boost questions concerning the 2016 allegations that the overall ledger was utterly unreliable.

In summary:

  • shouldn’t be mentioned, but which was included by reference and appendix to the primary of July, describes the FBI, which continues to be investigating the Basic Ledger
  • The July 2017 stock choice isn’t based mostly on proof of the primary e-book or its story; moderately the story about it (however not the primary guide) is described because the background that explains Manafort's lies in ties to Ukraine
  • What the FBI utilized in October 2017, not only has been confirmed after the proof from 2016 exhibits that the e-book was utterly bunk, but Since then, Manafort has been guilty of what it is coping with

The requirement behind Solomon's unbreakable propaganda is fierce.

Representatives of the FBI knew that the ledger was cast, but used it in any case

How the FBI used the ledger for every of those 3 times is essential to Salomon's declare that the FBI "knew" that the primary ledger was pretend however used it in any case. Salomon argues that "documents and more than ten interviews with expert sources" prove that "the cover was repeatedly warned that the document could not be trusted and was probably a fake". However he solely provides two proofs. To start with, he mentions Nazar Kholodnytsk's allegations concerning the Essential Letter (however does not report how he spoke together with his solutions).

Ukrainian supreme anti-corruption prosecutor Nazar Kholodnytsky advised me that he warned the US Department of Regulation Enforcement Cooperation and various FBI representatives at the finish of summer time 2016, the Ukrainian authorities, who returned the accounts, believed that it was doubtless fraud.

”It was not thought-about a documentary by Manafort. It was not verified. After which it should not be utilized in any approach towards accusations, ”Kholodnytsky reminded him of what he advised the FBI representatives.

Kholodnytsky has been in Trump-related issues and his own scandals in current months. so I'm all for, when Solomon interviewed him (and whether or not Rudy Giuliani included). However assuming that his representation of what he informed the FBI is true and confirmed (which might be true, Manafort would have found your discovery, but which Solomon does not point out) doesn’t change the fact that the ebook was not used for accusations to anyone – regardless that it was still beneath investigation in 2017.

Nor is Solomon's trust in Kilimnik's claims. Kilimnik stated in the long run: "I am pretty sure that Paul is not vulnerable either in cash or in black-Fara possessions." Kilimnik was not improper in each Manafort and different American Sam Patten vulnerability in FARA, but he took motion during several Manafort studies – in collaboration with Alex van der Zwaan to stop evidence of FARA violations in 2012 and to succeed in different advisers to cowl america lobbying for Manafort – which led to legal expenses for themselves and others, especially FARA. In other phrases, Kilimnik made these allegations at a time when he was concerned in a number of crimes in an try and rescue Manafort's FARA offenses, so there isn’t any cause to cope with what he says to be reliable

. – particularly that "nobody does anything to Ukraine other than Ukrainians" – which are amazingly inconsistent with the actions he had taken three weeks earlier so that both america and Russia would settle in Ukraine with the help of Manafort. [19659004Theendoftheyearinthenextquarteroftheyearinthemidstofaquarrelinginthemanpower

I do know he did not know concerning the existence of black money – he never targeting such things and could not have taken giant quantities of money over three borders. It was all the time a special arrangement – payments have been made to corporations that aren’t violations (SuperPAC system), and then he took his personal charge and paid his taxes, and so on.

Refused that Manafort knew any money funds have been insignificant because he additionally tried to maintain credible suspicion of Cayman's choir corporations. However it has additionally now proved (partially to Manafort's guilt) that the chorus corporations he used did not have SuperPAC, his funds for cost were not authorized, and he didn’t pay his taxes.

A short smoking bomb document from Salomon has the appropriate wing, which exhibits that Kilimnik was at greatest ignorant and extra more likely to lie false.

Salomon claims that even TS Ellis discovered unpersuasive

. doesn’t cease. He is making an attempt to revive the assertion of Manafort, who tried as part of the EDVA experiment, that the pleasant decide TS Ellis of Manafort was already mistaken, suggesting that the FBI and DOJ illegally bribed AP's journalists to one in every of these tales.

There are two hanging issues

First, the agent did not disclose that each FBI officials and the Ministry of Justice (DOJ) Prosecutor Andrew Weissmann, who later turned Mueller's deputy, met with AP journalists at some point before the story was revealed.

The FBI document of April 11, 2017 said that AP's suppliers "learned that they had a good idea of ​​the business of Manafort" in Ukraine.

The leak, which the federal government had facilitated and then used to help the evidence within the Black Guide, was clearly warned of the doc.

In April 2018, the Manafort staff Dr. Ed claims that the prosecutors had leaked illegally, partly based mostly on the April 2017 AP story. The government said that none of the tales mirrored a large jury, the accusation made by Manafort. On June 29, Decide Ellis held hearings, including a certificate from one of the representatives of the FBI, attending an AP assembly, Jeffrey Pfeiffer. Pfeiffer coated both the AP meeting and the search for storage, ie Decide TS Ellis heard his testimony of both of this stuff directly. Pfeiffer stated that he and others on the AP meeting did not actually touch upon probably the most questions, however acquired investigation info from the AP.

Q. Now you might have previously proven that you’ve been on the lookout for a storage unit. How did you understand that Manafort used a storage unit?

A. I don't keep in mind precisely. It was both through research efforts or through a gathering with Associated Press editors

[snip]

Q. And how did the government's representatives reply?

A. Typically, there are not any feedback on questions about any type of analysis.

Q. On the idea of the meeting, it seemed that journalists would have made a big research of Manafort?

A. That they had.

Q. Through the assembly, one of the journalists talked about a storage unit in Alexandria, Virginia, which was related to Manafor?

A.

In his cross-study, Pfeiffer repeated that the federal government typically did not comment on the AP, and he did not keep in mind the comment that AP had a good idea of ​​the enterprise of Manafort.

Q. So, once I checked a few of the Jencks materials I had simply given, I needed to ask you a selected piece at the end of one of many notes written for that meeting and I need to touch upon it. It says, "At the end of the meeting, AP's journalists asked if we would be willing to tell them if they were off or on the wrong track, and they were told they seem to understand Manafort's business." Now you’d agree that it isn’t "no remark

A. Proper

Q. Okay, and when it says "they were instructed", who on the federal government aspect advises these AP journalists on the nature of Manafort's business relations?

A. it will be so, so I couldn't – inform you who stated.

Salomon gives just certainly one of two digital communications related to this assembly. Pfeiffer has a unique focus than Karen Greenaway, whose Salomon hyperlinks have been a lot much less targeted on the e-book and rather more on Manafort's financial It describes the FBI, which makes no comments, but each ECs make it clear that The AP got here to the story of the library, but one Salomon link points to AP journalists who increase two things that appear in the stock choice: how did Manafort first get to know Rinat Ahmetov and that Manafort shared a categorized NSC document with Akhmetov.

reveals that the FBI had some feedback on Brit, who had introduced Akhmetov to Manafor, but didn’t tell AP. Nothing in these documents indicates that the FBI offered materials info to AP – on the contrary, it exhibits that AP offered info to the FBI and the FBI did not repeatedly present any comment. Additionally they undoubtedly present that AP came to the meeting about the primary ebook

At the conclusion of Pfeiffer's consultation, TS Ellis took the leak in line with the problem, so he couldn’t find the case of Manafort convincing. Every week later, Manafort tried to get Elli again in useless. Briefly, a really friendly decide at Manafort has checked out both of those questions and discovered them to be insufficient to convince. Salomon doesn’t point out this to his readers.

There’s ample evidence to revoke Solomon's foamy claims. Extra importantly, there’s proof that his smoking items certificates, despatched by Mr Kilimnik to Schwartz, exhibits that Kilimnik lied actively about both Ukraine and Manafort through the period when the Republicans claimed to be an trustworthy informant of the State Department.

it's not John Solomon's job to tell what the proof truly exhibits.

As I introduced final July, I gave the FBI details about Mueller research points, so I'm going to incorporate mueller alerts at Mueller websites here. I also present whether or not or not the material shared with the FBI is.

  image_print