1 Analysis Latest World News

Can the F-35 Lightning II all-around fighter avoid the fate of the F-22 Raptor? – Analysis – Eurasia Review

Scott Hubinger *

The USA has developed and purchased two fifth-era fighter jets that incorporate stealth or low radar detectable features, the F-22 Raptor and the F-35 Lightning II. These two plane symbolize pure compromises between single objective non-widespread aircraft (F-22) and multipurpose joint plane for a number of US and related army providers (F-35). The F-22 program evaluate raises questions and suggests pitfalls that could be widespread to both packages. Why, for example, was the F-22 program canceled after solely 1 / 4 of the deliberate aircraft had been acquired, and did the fate of the F-22 give the F-35 any lessons or recognize the risks of its success? [19659002] Has the United States also made the right decisions for the superior combat plane defense business? Lastly, new weapon techniques, corresponding to the Basic Atomics MQ-1 Predator and MQ-9 Reaper, are extremely disruptive as a result of they symbolize a new means of waging conflict and have been developed and manufactured by a new entrant. Such disruptive applied sciences, in addition to ongoing technological developments and modifications in the semiconductor and robotics markets, make the many years-lengthy design, improvement, and procurement durations unsustainable. The aim of this text is to spotlight and examine the F-22 and F-35 packages and to make recommendations for adapting to speedy technological and market modifications. For this objective, the article is split into 4 sections: F-22 Raptor; F-35 Lightning II and multinational (F-35) versions for single-service (F-22) procurement models; semiconductors; and conclusions and proposals to deal with the issues and considerations raised in the first, second and third sections.

F-22 Raptor Program

Task of Superior Tactical Fighter to Exchange Air Pressure F-15. Kotka was contracted by the Air Pressure in 1981, and the unique idea definition contracts have been signed with seven plane producers. Seven rivals have been downgraded to Lockheed Martin, Basic Dynamics and Boeing, and Northrop and McDonnell Douglas.

Two competing fashions emphasized maneuverability (Lockheed's YF-22) and theft and velocity (Northrop's YF-23), the Lockheed-led workforce gained the design competitors after the race and in 1991 after the race. The establishment of formal groups in the design competition allowed journalists to share the danger of creating plane prototypes and to concentrate on certain elements of advanced fighter aircraft, whereas decreasing competition. The ultimate design included parts of both design prototypes, emphasizing excessive know-how, integrated avionics, super-course of (i.e., the capacity to exceed sound velocity without utilizing the afterburner) and vectorized engine thrust (offering better management). .1

The manufacture of advanced fighter plane requires engineering and manufacturing experience and processes not present in civil aeronautics with supplies, avionics, engines, and techniques integration methods which are beyond or beyond current know-how. In addition, the improvement and acquisition of advanced fighter plane are sensitive to technological change. In the 1960s, McDonnell Douglas established leadership together with his expertise in avionics and guided missiles (reminiscent of the F-four Phantom II and F-15 Eagle). Equally, the improvement of progressive stealth know-how, first used by Lockheed Martin in the F-117 Nighthawk company in the 1980s, changed the management of that firm and contributed to its position as a basic contractor in each F-22 and F-35 procurement packages.2.

The Air Pressure planned to accumulate 790 F-22s. Early publish-Chilly Struggle cuts decreased it to 648, and by 1997, the Department of Protection finances had fallen by 38 % compared to the 1985 price range, and procurement had been reduce by two-thirds. This tightening of the price range put strain on the F-22 program, but as early as 2008 the Air Pressure chief of employees publicly introduced that at the least 381 F-22 engines can be required to satisfy operational requirements. However, in 2009, Defense Minister Robert Gates introduced that the manufacturing of the F-22 will end at 187.3. How and why did this happen?

DOD 1993 Bottom-Up Review (BUR) lowered Air Drive fighter jet to 20 fighter wings. comparable and complete F-22 manufacturing to only 442 aircraft. The F-22's primary criticism was that the submit-Cold Warfare menace setting did not justify its value, and the BUR outlined DOD's major obligations in stopping major regional conflicts, maintaining overseas presence, conducting small-scale interventions and preventing assaults, together with weapons of mass destruction. None of these necessary duties included the have to battle the highest numbers of superior Soviet fighters and assault aircraft.four.

Persevering with disruption brought on by technical challenges and monetary instability pressured the Air Drive to switch the F-22 program in 1993, 1994, 1996, and 1997, and growing prices led to the institution of a Joint Assessment Group (JET) in 1996 to estimate future program costs and price improve. The 1998 National Protection Licensing Act used the JET estimate and set a $ 43.four billion cap on manufacturing costs. Congress lowered $ 37.6 billion in 2009 to consider decrease-than-expected inflation. Thus, the demand-pushed procurement course of turned a price range-pushed process and, in accordance with this "buy-in-budget" technique, the decreased production volumes should finance attainable further production costs (ie, stay under the ceiling). larger manufacturing costs, which in turn will result in further cuts in unit manufacturing volumes and so on. and so forth.

F-22 confronted political pressures when it got here to combining price range issues. In 2001, Donald Rumsfeld turned Minister of Defense with the mandate to reform the DOD. In congressional testimony, he used the phrase "change" when describing his efforts to organize the division for brand spanking new and totally different threats in the submit-Chilly Conflict world, and emphasized the have to reactivate necessary weapon techniques resembling the Tomahawk cruise missile, F-15, F-18 and F-16. The secretary's certificates did not embrace the highest priority of the Air Pressure's procurement (F-22). Additional value overruns, in addition to embarrassing tanker procurement scandals involving senior civilian air drive and Boeing Corporation (a Lockheed Martin production workforce associate in F-22), led to Presidential Price range Directive 753, which removed production finance after the financial yr. 2008, cessation of manufacturing in 183 models (the Air Pressure spent the next 5 years making an attempt to reverse the choice however acquired only 4 further F-22s) .6

F-35 Lightning II, often known as F-35 Lightning II Also referred to as Joint Strike Fighter (JSF), is the end result of a mixture of packages that began in the 1980s and early 1990s. During this time, quite a few packages tried to develop new tactical plane for the US Air Pressure, the US Navy, the US Marine Corps, and the Royal Navy of the United Kingdom. Beginning in 1983, the Defense Superior Research Tasks Agency (DARPA) began looking for obtainable technologies to switch the overtone for the Marine AV-eight Harrier Superior Brief Take Off / Vertical Landing (ASTOVL) aircraft. The program will ultimately grow to be a joint US-UK cooperation. Next, in the late 1980s, Lockheed Martin's Skunk Works took part in a categorised "black" program with the Nationwide Aeronautics and Area Administration (NASA) to research the technical feasibility of a stolen ultrasonic fighter (SSF) with Brief Rise / Vertical Touchdown (STOVL) functionality. Work's expertise in anti-theft and NASA providers and capabilities, together with wind tunnels, skilled personnel and supercomputers.

This highly categorized program showed that it was potential to steal an overtone. The DARPA ASTOVL and NASA / Skunk Works SSF design ideas have been initially meant to switch the US Marine AV-8B fighter jet and the UK Harrier II bounce jet. Nevertheless, when a number of variants have been proposed in 1993 that have been capable of meet other service needs (that’s, widespread ones), the two packages have been consolidated into the CALF (Widespread Reasonably priced Lightweight Fighter) program, which was dealt with by the experimental nature of DARPA concepts. The aim of the CALF program was to develop the applied sciences and concepts needed to build ASTOVL plane for the US Marine and Royal Navy, while using these methods and ideas to develop and produce a very common normal take-off and touchdown (CTOL). variant for the United States Air Drive.7

America Navy launched its Advanced Tactical Aircraft (ATA) program in 1983 to develop an extended-vary, extremely unobtrusive, high payload assault plane to exchange the service-based mostly Grumman A-6 invader. Referred to as the A-12 Avenger II, this flying wing design was meant to be an extended-range subonic plane with a big inner load of weapons, together with air-to-air guns and air-to-air weapons, however with excessive value and schedule overhead and technical This system was canceled in early 1991. Throughout the similar period, the Navy additionally agreed, following Congress's intervention, to guage the Naval Superior Tactical Fighter (now F-22) model of the Naval Advanced Tactical Fighter (NATF) program as a attainable alternative for the F-14 Tomcat in response to Air Drive A .

Early in 1991, the Navy realized that a collection of upgrades to its F-14s could possibly be met to improve the degree of airline superiority by 2015, and the NATF was rejected. Similarly, the Air Pressure began a multi-position fighter program in the early 1990s to develop a low value alternative F-16 per unit of Falcon (i.e., manufacturing costs and manufacturing prices solely) tools wanted to build one unit to $ 35 million to $ 50 million. Nevertheless, the finish of the Cold Struggle made the life of the F-16 less important, and the program was put on hold in August 1992 after which canceled after BUR.eight in 1993.

Following the withdrawal of each ATAs and the NATF packages, the Navy Secretary ordered the launch of a new A-6 alternative program. This program, referred to as the AX program, was designed to develop advanced, "state-of-the-art" service-based mostly, multi-mode airplanes with day / night time, all-weather, low-visibility targets, lengthy-vary, two engines, two crews and superior integrated aeronautics. With the involvement of the Air Drive (which was nonetheless looking for alternative F-111), the program turned often known as the A / FX program, however was also canceled by the 1993 BUR, and the A / FX's efforts targeted on transition expertise and results for the future Joint Superior Strike Know-how (JAST) program.9

The JAST program, which turned the JSF program by way of the merger of CALF and JAST packages, aimed to create a standard know-how platform that might theoretically achieve economies of scale and require easier logistics resulting from replaceable spare elements. to switch three distinctly totally different plane: the F-16 as a multi-pilot mild fighter; F-18 service-based mostly, multi-position fighter; and Harrier in STOVL format, which has high consistency between the three variations. This amalgamation of aircraft varieties was made potential (rationalized) by uniting the US protection business after the finish of the Cold Struggle; this created bigger, extra capable corporations, but in addition further restricted competition in markets that were not notably exposed to competing market forces.10

. The F-35 Lightning II is designed (designed) to be a comparatively cheap fifth-era (Stealth) fighter jet that may be manufactured in three versions for the Air Drive, Marines and Navy at a high degree of uniformity (70-90%) of their aircraft, weapon methods, avionics, energy crops and software to avoid, in concept, the three prices of creating, purchasing, and maintaining and maintaining a totally totally different plane designed to satisfy the similar however totally different operational requirements of each service. That is why, in November 1996, DOD chosen Lockheed Martin and Boeing to compete in the JAST idea demonstration and contracted to permit every company to construct and check two aircraft independently to strengthen its competing concept for all three deliberate options. Separately, the division also contracted with Pratt and Whitney to offer transportation gear and technical help. In October 2001, DOD selected Lockheed design as the winner of the competition, and the Joint Strike Fighter program entered the system improvement and demonstration part, with contracts for Lockheed Martin plane and Pratt and Whitney energy crops.11.

The F-35A, developed for the US Air Drive, is a CTOL plane. As it’s technically the most difficult of the three choices, it’s also the least expensive. The F-35A is designed to switch the F-16 Preventing Falcons, the A-10 Thunderbolt II and probably some older F-15 Eagles. The F-35A shouldn’t be reported to be as stealth or as succesful of air-to-air fight than F-22, however higher air-to-floor combat than F-22 and stealth than F-16. The F-35A is designed to be a more reasonably priced addition to the F-22 Raptor, however such affordability will depend upon how many models are ultimately purchased. Developed for the US Marines, the F-35B is the STOVL aircraft, the costliest and technically difficult of the three choices. The F-35B is to switch the AV-8B Harrier STOVL aircraft, the F / A-18A / B / C / D CTOL fighter jets and the British Royal Navy Harrier II aircraft. The Marines need the F-35B's more refined sensor set and very unobtrusive options to reinforce US troop help. Developed for the US Navy, the F-35C is a service-based mostly CTOL aircraft and is midway between value and technical complexity between the A and B versions. The Navy believes that the deliberate convergence of the F-35 will reduce improvement, acquisition and operational prices and improve interoperability with both the US Air Pressure and allied associate nations. Lastly, the F-35's integrated avionics software program is designed and engineered to mechanically combine on-board sensor info with info from Aegis and different air protection techniques (akin to different fight plane) to reinforce fight capability and disrupt the US method combat aircraft work together with allied plane .12

Joint Multinational vs . Single Service Buy Fashions . The F-22 Raptor was designed, developed, manufactured, and procured as a single-service single-position fighter jet. The F-35 Lightning II is designed and developed and manufactured and purchased as a single (multi-service), multi-nationwide, multi-national combat plane. Nevertheless, this does not alter, or to some extent exacerbate, the elementary challenges beforehand described which have contributed to the failure of the F-22 to acquire the planned quantity of aircraft. One purpose for this is that potential savings13 in the lifecycle value of a joint procurement program compared to a single service program – achieved by slicing duplicate analysis, improvement, testing and evaluation prices and attaining larger economies of scale in manufacturing and maintenance efforts – can scale back the want for higher design, manufacturing and upkeep. to satisfy a number of service requirements in a single “collaborative” design. For example, the unique design aim of the F-35 was to realize 80% connectivity, however in Milestone B, three variants ranged from 45% to 70% connectivity in terms of body weight; by July 2008, the convergence of aircraft frameworks ranged from 27% to 43% 14. In addition, the number of primary aircraft contractors in the United States has decreased from eight in the 1980s to only three as we speak (Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and Boeing), and at this time only Lockheed Martin is the principal contractor for advanced fifth era manned aircraft. Decreasing the number of prime contractors has decreased competitors, might discourage innovation and make it harder for the US authorities to regulate costs.15

Another challenge for the F-35 is the need for the similar manufacturer to supply three totally different variants. Manufacturing an inhomogeneous product can complicate the learning of plant staff and managers and accelerate the decline in the worth of all learning on account of the have to interrupt the manufacturing of one product to supply another. This learning process is especially essential in fighter plane manufacturing, the place a extremely expert workforce accounts for a large proportion of complete value and the amassed manufacturing experience supplies progressively greater manufacturing value reductions as expertise increases productivity and reduces unit prices. If the variations between the three choices have been minor, as initially deliberate, the destructive results on studying could also be minor. Nevertheless, resulting from vital variations, a slower learning course of and accelerated write-downs of accrued manufacturing expertise considerably improve program prices and thus program danger.

Lastly, an necessary and vital distinction between the F-22 program and the F-35 program is the internationalization of each F-35 improvement and its procurement. At present, the F-35 program has three international partnerships. The UK is the solely Degree 1 international associate and costs around $ 2 billion in improvement prices. Italy and the Netherlands are the solely Degree 2 international partners, accounting for about $ 1 billion and $ 800 million respectively. Degree 3 international partners embrace Turkey, Canada, Australia, Norway and Denmark, and account for about $ 725 million in improvement prices. 17

America Army and our worldwide companions and allies are anticipated to buy F-35s. 1,763 US Air Drive F-35A; 353 F-35Bs and 67 F-35Cs by US Marines; 260 F-35Cs from the US Navy; 138 F-35A from the United Kingdom; 100 F-35As from Turkey; 60 F-35A and 30 F-35B Italy; 72 F-35As from Australia; 52 F-35As from Norway; 50 F-35A from Israel; 42 F-35A from Japan; 40 F-35A Republic of Korea; 37 F-35A Netherlands; 34 F-35A, Belgium; and 27 F-35As in Denmark.18 Nevertheless, the US Government and Lockheed Martin are negotiating the value of all Lockheed Martin-produced F-35s, each for domestic use by the US Army and to be used by overseas governments. the worth to be paid by every overseas government shall be negotiated between the United States Authorities and every corresponding overseas authorities. Additionally, the "export" version of the F-35 might not embrace all the options of the "domestic" model, which creates much more variations and further complicates the manufacturing studying course of.

Lockheed Martin and each also negotiate variations individually. corresponding overseas authorities. Though the F-35 combating program could also be unprecedented on a worldwide scale, compensation in both the protection and crime sectors is sort of widespread. offset is a contract during which the buyer consists of in the contract a situation that the seller should perform sure actions in favor of the purchaser. The contract might take the type of cogeneration, subcontracting, licensed manufacturing, know-how transfer and different industrial cooperation akin to training.19 In the case of the F-35, Lockheed Martin is inspired to offer compensation in change for elevated orders from any overseas authorities, together with the risk of cheaper manufacturing, assembly or different prices. Outdoors the United States.

Overseas consumers are encouraged to switch know-how to their domestic industries and / or to create jobs. This complicated multi-celebration desk of negotiated prices between the US authorities and Lockheed Martin, negotiated prices between the US government and every overseas government, and negotiated transfers between Lockheed Martin and every overseas government, makes value management harder and may benefit overseas consumers at a price. US taxpayers.

Turbulence Program . The JSF has been renewed 3 times up to now: in December 2003, March 2007 and March 2012. The newest reorganization turned essential when in early 2010 unit value estimates exceeded the statutory crucial thresholds, an event generally known as the Nunn-McCurdy violation. . Beneath this statute and to avoid program expiration, the Secretary of Defense confirmed to Congress in June 2010 that the program was mandatory for nationwide security.20 As required by regulation, DOD then withdrew its earlier interim target and established a brand new procurement basis, and commenced reorganization to increase testing and supply schedules; suspending the purchase of aircraft for the future (for instance, until 2044), however didn’t scale back the complete number of aircraft. The April 2015 JSF program report from the US Authorities Audit Workplace (GAO) states that the main value, schedule and performance points for the F-35 are, based on GAO estimates, selections made at key mid-program levels with out adequate product info. Particularly, the design of Lockheed Martin was chosen in October 2001, earlier than the plane had been sufficiently developed and important know-how developed. As well as, program scheduling requires a simultaneous procurement technique with high levels of improvement, testing and manufacturing overlap, and though the degree of concurrency has decreased, it has not been eliminated.21

In addition, the upkeep value of three US Military providers over each 60-year life cycle is estimated at 1 , $ 12 trillion. That's why DOD strives to implement an reasonably priced upkeep strategy that may meet the needs of the US Military and our international partners and allies, and that can keep over 3100 F-35s over the F-35's 100 years of improvement, production, and service life. Nevertheless, this strategy faces challenges, together with upkeep help for basic contractor Lockheed Martin, in addition to product integration, and the dependence of all domestic and overseas F-35 clients on Lockheed Martin's managed international belongings, a singular F-35 program. There are additionally asymmetries between the numerous US army and our worldwide companions and allies in the number of plane purchased and maintained, leading to uneven dependencies on the success of the F-35 program. Both of these elements can result in considerably much less aircraft procurement than is presently expected and lead to vital unit value will increase as production volumes decline, as occurred in the F-22 Raptor program.

Finally, the F-35's sensors and weapons, both internally and with other aircraft, are believed to be its most essential capability, and this improved capability to integrate sensors and weapons is achieved primarily by means of refined software program.23 The functionality offered by the software program has drastically increased since the 19th century. Starting at less than 10 % with the introduction of the F-4 Phantom II in 1960, this performance elevated to 10 % when the A-7 Corsair II was introduced in 1964, to 20 % when the F-111 Aardvark was launched. in 1970 to 35 % when the F-15 Eagle was introduced in 1975, 45 % when the F-16 Preventing Falcon was introduced in 1982, 65 % when the B-2 spirit was launched in 1990, and 80 % by taking the F-22 Raptor Deployed in 2000.24 In line with an April 2014 evaluation by the Congressional Analysis Service, writing, validating, debugging, and updating F-35 software (i.e., Block 1, which offers Plane primary flight capability installed in early F-35 supply up to block 3F) designed to offer full combat capability) is one of the largest and costliest challenges of the JSF program.25 In its April 2017 evaluate of the program, GAO additionally highlighted the importance of software program and raised considerations about check delays and the increased value of absolutely creating F-35 software program.26

current status of program . The F-35 program has advanced. By September 28, 2018, greater than 320 plane have been operating from 15 bases worldwide, roughly 680 pilots and 6,100 maintainers had been educated, and the fleet had greater than 155,000 cumulative flight hours.27 The US Marines introduced the preliminary F-35B capability in July 2015 and the US F-35A August 2016.28 In addition, Lockheed Martin, basic contractor, has improved manufacturing effectivity and demonstrated learning whereas continuing to supply plane. Average hours labored per aircraft delivered have decreased considerably from 2012 to 2017. Complete hours worked per aircraft delivered for scrap, finishing and repair have also decreased. Similarly, Pratt and Whitney have proven enhancements in manufacturing effectivity and decreased working time.

The F-35 software program bureau also invests in tasks to scale back production and maintenance prices, and seeks to buy financial orders for elements which are used throughout multiple aircraft buy batches.29 Thus, the unit value of the FIP unit with aircraft, engine and premium, LRIP Lot 11, which is scheduled to start deliveries in 2019, is $ 89.2 million, 5.four %. low cost of $ 94.three million from the LRIP installment. F-35B unit costs $ 115.5 million, a 5.7 % reduction from the LRIP lot's $ 10.four million. F-35C unit prices $ 107.7 million, down 11.1 % on $ 121.2 million for LRIP batch 10.30. A statistical evaluation by RAND Corporation's Air Pressure has proven that vital value financial savings could be achieved by investing in the design and manufacture of rovements to scale back unit prices and by purchasing a number of F-35s, to name simply two. 31


As noted in the introduction, semiconductor and robotics engineering and market modifications are making decades- Long design, improvement and acquisition occasions for advanced weapon techniques corresponding to the F-35 Lightning II are unsustainable and require shorter manufacturing cycles with or with out. Immediately, the value of building a excessive-tech manufacturing facility or manufacturing facility (in any other case referred to as a fab) leading to semiconductor manufacturing is $ 10 billion and rising. Because of these costs, corporations that cannot scale or can’t afford fab use a fabless mannequin that strikes production to a worldwide ecosystem the place corporations create microchip designs, microchip design tools, elements and supplies and use fab models. In consequence, the world leader in know-how edge semiconductor manufacturing has dramatically stabilized, with only four corporations producing globally at 14 nanometers (nm) or having the potential to go between 10 and 10. 7 nm nodes: Intel in the US; Taiwan's semiconductor manufacturing company in Taiwan; Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates – Owned International Foundries in New York State; ja Samsung Electronics Etelä-Koreassa. Tämän yhdistymisen ja sen tosiasian vuoksi, että yli 98 prosenttia puolijohteiden kysynnästä tulee yksityiseltä ja kaupalliselta sektorilta, ei Yhdysvaltojen hallitukselta tai puolustusteollisuudesta, pääsy aitoihin, väärentämättömiin sotilaallisiin tietokonepiireihin ja edistyneiden asejärjestelmien taattu käyttöoikeus valmistusmahdollisuuksiin on lisääntymässä vaarassa. Siksi, kuten kansallisen puolustusyliopiston Eisenhowerin kansallisen turvallisuuden ja resurssistrategian koulutuslaitoksen julkaisemassa kevään 2016 elektroniikkateollisuuden tutkimusraportissa todetaan, Yhdysvaltojen suuret asejärjestelmät altistuvat vanhenemiselle puolijohdepohjaisissa elektroniikka- ja ohjelmistoalijärjestelmissä.32

. taattu pääsy huipputeknisiin piivalimon prosesseihin on kriittinen kansakunnan kyvylle ylläpitää Yhdysvaltain asevoimien teknologista reunaa ja määräävää asemaa nykyaikaisella taistelukentällä. Nämä prosessit tekevät mahdolliseksi uusien ominaisuuksien kehittämisen navigoinnissa, havainnoinnissa ja elektronisessa sodankäynnissä vain muutamia mainitakseni. Vuonna 2014 DOD: n luotettavan valimo-ohjelman puitteissa luotettavat pääsy sekä huipputekniselle piiteknologialle että vanhalle piiteknologialle rajoitettiin useless yhteen yritykseen, IBM: ään. Vuoden 2014 jälkeen IBM: n puolijohdetilojen myynti Abu Dhabin omistamille globaaleille valimoille olisi voinut antaa kriittisen iskun DOD: n kyvylle käyttää tekniikkaa aallonpituudella 65 nm ja alle. Luotettavan valimo-ohjelman ja globaalien valimoiden välinen sopimus International Foundries 2: n muodostamisesta näyttää tarjoavan nykyisen ja lähiajan pääsyn 14 nm: n solmuun. Nevertheless, the lengthy-term financial viability of this association is questionable in the face of pressures to realize business profitability within the former IBM amenities.33

These modifications in the semiconductor business and market are additionally affecting DOD’s F-35 modernization program, termed Block 4, as officials brazenly state that the F-35’s current knowledge processor is working at most capacity and will have to be replaced with an updated processor with increased capability in order for the first increment of Block four to perform as meant.34 Given its low market share (2 % or less), DOD is solely depending on International Foundries 2 and small quantity producers of legacy pc chips for its knowledge processor and different semiconductor needs.

In addition to being in danger of obsolescence of their semiconductor-based mostly digital and software program subsystems, present manned fight aircraft, together with the F-35, are additionally in danger of obsolescence in their technological edge and d ominance on the battlefield on account of these similar tendencies in semiconductors and the electronic units that incorporate them. For instance, the improvement and deployment of the Basic Atomics MQ-1 Predator and MQ-9 Reaper wouldn’t have been potential without the significantly elevated performance and decreased weight of at present’s semiconductor-based mostly units.

Unmanned army aircraft corresponding to the Predator and Reaper are also highly disruptive in that they symbolize a new approach of waging struggle and have been developed and manufactured by a brand new, non–Lockheed Martin market entrant. Additional disruptions may be simply anticipated and predicted. For example, a decade ago the idea that drones might act as stationary “air mines” and even act collectively as self-guiding swarms would have seemed as ridiculous and as tactically useless as the barrage balloons and wind-blown hearth balloons of the earlier century. Nevertheless, algorithms already exist at the moment for programming drones to “see and avoid,” and an ability to see and avoid can just as easily be became a see-and-not-avoid capability. Moreover, drone swarming was demonstrated by the Naval Postgraduate Faculty in August 2015, when 50 drones have been manually managed with a single controller. Subsequently, in November 2016, the Intel Company created a holiday mild show for Disney Springs, Florida, with 300 drones shifting in complicated choreographed three-dimensional formations, also with just a single controller. Complicated choreographed three-dimensional drone formations have been additionally demonstrated at the 2017 Tremendous Bowl halftime show that starred Woman Gaga.

Moreover, any collision between an plane and a drone can be rather more damaging than a comparable collision with a chook because of the materials composition of the drone. In collisions with aircraft, birds behave more like fluids upon impression, such that the disintegration of the fowl absorbs a lot of the influence power. In contrast, drones are comprised of metallic, plastic, and other relatively nondeformable materials, so any plane struck by a drone will probably be uncovered to a much larger influence power.35 Lastly, it has been instructed that a tactically autonomous, machine-piloted combat aircraft might deliver new and unmatched lethality to air-to-air combat, and by constantly sending telemetry to a floor or airborne control station, the putative autonomous combat plane might study from its personal demise and in near real time provide variations to different autonomous combat aircraft in the struggle.

Conclusions and Recommendations

With a total deliberate procurement of all F-35 variants on the order of three,000 models, brief-time period, small-quantity procurements aren’t advisable once full price production begins because it disincentivizes Lockheed Martin and its suppliers from making long-time period investments in gear and worker studying that would lead to decrease per unit prices. The Protection Division ought to, subsequently, work with the White Home and Congress to authorize, but not require, long run multiyear procurements for major weapons methods like the F-35. The F-35 program office also needs to proceed to increase upon tasks aimed toward decreasing production and sustainment costs and economic order quantity purchases of elements that can be used throughout multiple plane varieties and a number of procurement tons.

As well as, DOD’s improvement and acquisition efforts in the area of combat plane are too sluggish in the face of speedy modifications in combat plane capabilities, driven largely by advances in semiconductors and the electronic units and software program that utilize them. Subsequently, DOD should shift its acquisition focus for combat aircraft to the following:

  • sixth-era weapons techniques, assemblies, sub-assemblies, and software for present fifth-era F-22 and F-35 aircraft utilizing U.S. Authorities–owned intellectual property and associated design authority rights for these aircraft
  • drones, which can be utilized in defensive and/or offensive antiaircraft capacities
  • autonomous fight plane capable of remotely concentrating on and destroying enemy aircraft.

The purpose of these three recommended initiatives is to expedite the improvement and procurement of new progressive weapons and techniques and to offer alternatives for brand spanking new defense market entrants.

Finally, many stories in the literature, including most lately a comprehensive evaluation by the RAND Company underneath Undertaking Air Pressure, have indicated that financial savings from joint acquisition of main weapons methods resembling the F-35 are at greatest an open question and are extraordinarily troublesome to realize given the want to satisfy divergent Service and nation necessities within the similar design. As an alternative, the focus ought to be on widespread weapons methods, assemblies, subassemblies, and software program that can be shared by totally different platforms and on the very actual nonfinancial advantages of joint acquisitions to incorporate larger tactical and operational interoperability between army Providers and larger army-industrial cooperation between the United States and its allies.

The writer want to categorical his appreciation and due to the school and employees of the National Defense University’s Dwight D. Eisenhower Faculty for Nationwide Security and Resource Strategy for his or her assist and help.

*About the writer: Dr. Scott Hubinger is a senior chemist and staff leader for chemical controls in the Bureau of Business and Safety at the Department of Commerce.

Source: This text was revealed in the Joint Drive Quarterly 94, which is revealed by the Nationwide Protection University.


1 David R. King and John D. Driessnack, “Analysis of Competition in the Defense Industrial Base: An F-22 Case Study,” Modern Economic Coverage 55 (January 2006), 57–66.

2 Ibid.

3 Christopher J. Niemi, “The F-22 Acquisition Program: Consequences for the U.S. Air Force’s Fighter Fleet,” Air & Area Energy Journal (November–Decemb er 2012), 53–82, obtainable at .

4 Ibid.

5 Ibid.

6 Ibid.

7 See “History,” F-35 Lightning II Program Site, out there at .

8 Ibid.

9 Ibid.

10 Danny Lam and Brian Paul Cozzarin, “The Joint Strike Fighter/F-35 Program: A Canadian Technology Policy Perspective,” Air & Area Power Journal (March–April 2014), 45–76.

11 Jeremiah Gertler, F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) ProgramRL30563 (Washington, DC: Congressional Analysis Service, April 29, 2014), obtainable at .

12 Robbin F. Laird and Edward Timperlake, “The F-35 and the Future of Power Projection,” Joint Pressure Quarterly 66 (3rd Quarter 2012), 85–93.

13 Mark A. Lorell, “Commonality: Where It Works and Fails,” Aviati on Week & Area Know-how 177 (March 2015).

14 Mark A. Lorell et al., Do Joint Fighter Packages Save Money? (Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2013).

15 Trevor Taylor, “Competition in Defence Practice: Theory and Reality,” in Emerging Strategies in Defense Acquisitions and Army Procuremented. Kevin Burgess and Peter Antill (Hershey, PA: IGI International, 2016), 22–38.

16 Aneli Bongers, “Learning and Forgetting in the Jet Fighter Aircraft Industry,” PLOS ONE 12 (September 2017), 1–19.

17 See “Program: International Participation,” F-35 Lightning II Program Website, obtainable at .

18 Tom Kaminski, “F-35 Lightning II: Country by Country Analysis,” Aviation NewsDecember 2018, 32–38.

19 Anna Margaretha Malm, Anna Fredriksson, and Kerstin Johansen, “Bridging Capability Gaps in Technology Transfers Within Related Offsets,” Journal of Manufacturing Management 27 (2016), 640–661.

20 Moshe Schwartz, The Nunn-McCurdy Act: Background, Analysis, and Points for CongressR41293 (Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, March 3, 2015), out there at .

21 Authorities Accountability Office (G AO) , F-35 Joint Strike Fighter: Assessment Needed to Tackle Affordability ChallengesGAO-15-364 (Washington, DC: GAO, 2015).

22 GAO, F-35 Plane Sustainment: DOD Must Tackle Challenges Affecting Readiness and Value TransparencyGAO-18-75 (Washington, DC: GAO, 2017).

23 Gertler, F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) Program.

24 Lam and Cozzarin, “The Joint Strike Fighter/F-35 Program,” 45–76.

25 Gertler, F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) Program.

26 GAO, F-35 Joint Strike Fighter: DOD Must Complete Developmental Testing before Making Vital New InvestmentsGAO-17-351 (Washington, DC: GAO, 2017).

27 “Pentagon and Lockheed Martin Agree to Reduced F-35 Price in New Production Contract,” press release, F-35 Lightning II Program Site, September 28, 2018, obtainable at .[19659002]28 Ka minski, “F-35 Lightning II.”

29 GAO, F-35 Joint Strike Fighter: Improvement Is Almost Full, however Deficiencies Present in Testing Have to Be ResolvedGAO-18-321 (Washington, DC: GAO, 2018).

30 “Pentagon and Lockheed Martin Agree to Reduced F-35 Price in New Production Contract.”

31 James D. Powers et al., F-35 Block Purchase: An Evaluation of Potential Financial savingsRR-2063-AF (Santa Monica, CA: RAND, July 18, 2018), obtainable at .

32 B.G. Hussein Bani-Yassein et al., Electronics Business Research Report (Washington, DC: Dwight D. Eisenhower Faculty for Nationwide Safety and Resource Technique, Spring 2016), obtainable at .

33 Ibid.

34 GAO, F-35 Joint Strike Fighter: DOD’s Proposed Comply with-on Modernization Acquisition Technique Displays an Incremental Strategy Though Plans Are Not But FinalizedGAO-17-690R (Washington, DC: GAO, 2017).

35 Leslie F. Hauck III and John P. Geis II, “Air Mines: Countering the Drone Threat to Aircraft,” Air & Area Power Journal (Spring 2017), 26–40.

36 Michael W. Byrnes, “Nightfall: Machine Autonomy in Air-to-Air Combat,” Air & Area Power Journal (Might–June 2014), 48–75.

Please Donate Right now

Did you take pleasure in this article? Then think about donating immediately to make sure that Eurasia Review can nonetheless present comparable content.